Krakow is stuffed full of architectural marvels. What’s not immediately obvious is that the whole lot is built of brick. There’s nothing wrong with bricks, let me hasten to add, but it is a bit of a con job. The buildings look as if they’re made of stone, but they’re not; it’s brick all the way down. I spent another productive Sunday wandering around Krakow collecting evidence.
A typical Krakow building. Looks like it’s made of stone, but actually it’s brick covered in a layer of sculptured render.
Another typical Krakow building where the deceitful layer of render hasn’t yet been repaired.
Now, as I said, there’s nothing wrong with building in brick but I do wonder two things:
1. Why go to the trouble of pretending that a brick building isn’t a brick building? Especially when major municipal buildings such as the main cathedral, Kosciol Mariacki, is plainly and openly brick-built?
Brick-built and proud of it.
2. Where’s all the stone? Wawel sits on a mound of (rapidly dissolving) limestone but most of it seems to be made of brick. There are limestone quarries within the environs of the city including the notorious Plaszow quarry – adjacent to the Nazi’s Plaszow work camp. Why aren’t most of the building built of stone with all this limestone lying around?… ok, actually that was about four questions in one.
Wawel: Poland’s heart is made of brick (mostly).
In case you don’t believe me about the limestone, here’s a picture I took of a stone in the wall of a monastery in Krakow. You don’t get many fossils in brick.
I look at other buildings in ridiculous, but oddly exciting, detail over on Polandian.